Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M +13%
1.154 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M1000M +27%
124
Quadro K4000M
97
OctaneBench
Quadro M1000M +30%
26
Quadro K4000M
20
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK104
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy