Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (40W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +249%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M1000M
124
Quadro K5200 +136%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

40W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy