Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro M1000M and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (40W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
13568 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M1000M
1.017 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +4606%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
14080
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

15.89 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
31.78 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
1017 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
31.78 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

40W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Aldebaran
N16P-Q1-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Maxwell
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy