CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Router
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
Router Ranking
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K200
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
NVIDIA GRID K200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
GRID K200
+28%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000
VS
GRID K200
Graphics Card
Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K420
2
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M4000M
3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40t
4
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
5
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K100
6
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
7
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K560Q
8
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA GRID K340
9
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
10
NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Related News
1
Intel Wildcat Lake Appears on Shipping List with FCBGA1516 Socket, Poised to Replace Alder Lake-N
2
The Commencement of ARM and Qualcomm Licensing Dispute Trial: Potential Major Impact on PC Market
3
NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps
4
Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim
5
Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers
6
Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes
7
Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption
8
iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip
9
The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage
10
Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy