Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 142W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +267%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
768
Shading Units
256
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
142W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GF100
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy