Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
736 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +2132%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
768
Shading Units
32
48
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G84
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy