Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1163MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M +32%
2.369 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK104
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy