Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1163MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +98%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000
145
Quadro K5200 +102%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK110B
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy