Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
5504 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +687%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
6144
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy