NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K1
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K1 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+330%
1.405 TFLOPS
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.51GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
130W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GK107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-450-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
