CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
VS
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Tesla T10 Processor to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
400 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 188W)
NVIDIA Tesla T10 Processor 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+125%
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla T10 Processor
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
VS
Tesla T10 Processor
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Apr 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
512bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
240
40
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Board Design
55W
TDP
188W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile
3
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
4
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4
5
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600
6
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile
7
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
8
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000 SDI
9
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
10
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile 12 GB
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy