Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
384 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 142W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.86GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +189%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000
0.486 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Nov 2010
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
256
40
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF100
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GF100-825-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
142W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy