Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +120%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
7
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
336
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GF104
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy