Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
608 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +1656%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jun 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
640
Shading Units
32
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
80.00 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G84
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
NB8P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy