Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1098MHz vs 771MHz)
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200 +152%
3.553 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M
136
Quadro K5200 +115%
293
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
667 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2304
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GK110B
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy