Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +232%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
128
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
G92
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
100W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy