NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 9% (1200MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+468%
7.987 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M2000M
1180
RTX A2000
+403%
5936
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M2000M
552
RTX A2000
+391%
2712
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
640
Shading Units
3328
40
TMUs
104
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA106
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
