Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 2% (1124MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (45W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M +62%
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1058 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
384
40
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
45W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy