Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (55W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 1% (1114MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (12GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +387%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
988 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
3072
40
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GM200
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
250W
-
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy