Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 35% (1480MHz vs 1098MHz)
Lower TDP (47W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +34%
1.894 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M +4%
136
Quadro P1000
130
OctaneBench
Quadro M2000M +6%
34
Quadro P1000
32
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1266 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
5
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
640
40
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GP107
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
47W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy