NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A1000 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 48% (1627MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Embedded
+374%
6.664 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2000M
132
RTX A1000 Embedded
+882%
1297
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
1192 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1627 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
78.10 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.664 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.664 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
104.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
Unknown
148 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
