NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

VS

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages

Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages

Released 6 years and 8 months late

Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1950MHz vs 1098MHz)

More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

Quadro M2000M

1.405 TFLOPS

Data Center GPU Flex 140 +184%

3.994 TFLOPS

Quadro M2000M

VS

Data Center GPU Flex 140

Graphics Card

Dec 2015

Release Date

Aug 2022

Quadro Mobile

Generation

Data Center GPU

Professional

Type

Professional

MXM-A (3.0)

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz

Base Clock

1600 MHz

1098 MHz

Boost Clock

1950 MHz

1253 MHz

Memory Clock

1937 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

6GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

128bit

Memory Bus

96bit

80.19GB/s

Bandwidth

186.0GB/s

Render Config

-

SM Count

-

Compute Units

-

640

Shading Units

1024

40

TMUs

64

16

ROPs

32

-

Tensor Cores

-

RT Cores

8

64 KB (per SMM)

L1 Cache

-

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

62.40 GPixel/s

43.92 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

124.8 GTexel/s

-

FP16 (half)

7.987 TFLOPS

1405 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

3.994 TFLOPS

43.92 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

-

Graphics Processor

GM107

GPU Name

DG2-128

N16P-Q3-A2

GPU Variant

ACM-G11

Maxwell

Architecture

Generation 12.7

TSMC

Foundry

TSMC

28 nm

Process Size

6 nm

1.87 billion

Transistors

7.2 billion

148 mm²

Die Size

157 mm²

Board Design

55W

TDP

75W

-

Suggested PSU

250 W

No outputs

Outputs

1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0

None

Power Connectors

1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

5.0

CUDA

-

5.1

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104

2

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M

3

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 Mobile

4

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2200 S4

5

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P600

6

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile

7

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

8

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla M40 24 GB

9

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 380

10

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

Related News

1

Samsung's Own 3nm Yield is Disheartening: Galaxy S25 May Introduce MediaTek for the First Time

2

AMD Ryzen 9000 DDR5 Memory Frequency Soars: Reaches 8000MHz with All Four Slots Occupied

3

Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience

4

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

5

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

6

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

7

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

8

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

9

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

10

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower