Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1950MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +184%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1600 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
1024
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
DG2-128
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy