Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 4GB VRAM RTX A500 Embedded to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A500 Embedded 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1335MHz vs 1098MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
1.405 TFLOPS
RTX A500 Embedded +289%
5.468 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2015
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
435 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1335 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
16
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
64
-
RT Cores
16
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
42.72 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
85.44 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.468 TFLOPS
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.468 TFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.44 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GA107S
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
20W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy