NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000M
+36%
1.405 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Dec 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
43.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1405 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
43.92 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF110
N16P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
