Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 103% (2100MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (192GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
18432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +7600%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
304
1024
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
880
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
MI300
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
146 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
750W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy