NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 51% (1569MHz vs 1036MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 88.13GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+278%
8.033 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro M2200 Mobile
42
Quadro P5200 Max Q
+200%
126
Graphics Card
Jan 2017
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
695 MHz
Base Clock
1316 MHz
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
55W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
6.1
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
