Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA GRID K200

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA GRID K200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 256MB VRAM GRID K200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
GRID K200 +20%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jun 2013
Quadro
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1536
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy