Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +11029%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G98
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy