Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock924MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE +158%
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
924 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
51W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy