NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 4GB VRAM Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE 's Advantages
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 79% (1650MHz vs 924MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
Quadro T1000 Mobile GDDR6
+56%
2.957 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2016
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
823 MHz
Base Clock
1395 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1024
Shading Units
896
64
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.40 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.914 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.957 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.40 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU117B
-
GPU Variant
N19P-Q1-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
