Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

NVIDIA Quadro M3000 SE vs NVIDIA RTX A2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000 SE and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1200MHz vs 924MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000 SE
1.892 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 +322%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
562 MHz
924 MHz
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
1024
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.57 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
59.14 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
1.892 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
59.14 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
70W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GA106
-
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy