NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 2T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 2T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound 2T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
6656 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 2T
+542%
13.82 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
7680
64
TMUs
240
32
ROPs
120
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
108.0 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.65 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.82 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.456 TFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
500W
-
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
