NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+397%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
1024
Shading Units
240
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
