Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +3108%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G84
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy