Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +193%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
51W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GK107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy