Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
928 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 134W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +834%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
67.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
96
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
96 KB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
230.4 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G80
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
G80-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
134W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.0
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy