Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2200 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (68W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M +49%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K2200
1.439 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1046 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
640
64
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1439 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
44.96 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
68W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GM107
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy