NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+98%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
