NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K620M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620M 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+149%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro K620M
0.863 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM108
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
Unknown
398 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
