NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 6GB VRAM Tesla K20Xm to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (75W vs 235W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (249.6GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Tesla K20Xm
+83%
3.935 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
249.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2688
64
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.99 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
164.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.935 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1312 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
235W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK110
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.5
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
