NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M5000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro M5000
+97%
4.252 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Quadro M5000
+82%
3675
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Quadro M5000
+79%
1692
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
861 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
211.6GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
66.43 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.9 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.252 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
132.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM204
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GM204-875-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4
