Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +2338%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
16384
64
TMUs
1024
32
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
408 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
100 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
600W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy