Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 8GB VRAM Quadro RTX 4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (416.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 4000 +231%
7.119 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1005 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1625 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
416.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
36
-
Compute Units
-
1024
Shading Units
2304
64
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
222.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
14.24 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.119 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
222.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
TU104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
160W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy