NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
2304 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
RTX A2000
+271%
7.987 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
RTX A2000
+194%
5936
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
RTX A2000
+188%
2712
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
562 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
26
1024
Shading Units
3328
64
TMUs
104
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
104
-
RT Cores
26
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.60 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GA106
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GA106-850-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
12 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.7
