NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 16GB VRAM Tesla T4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Tesla T4 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
2.15 TFLOPS
Tesla T4
+278%
8.141 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
Quadro M3000M
2016
Tesla T4
+176%
5569
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
Quadro M3000M
941
Tesla T4
+176%
2600
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Sep 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
585 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
40
1024
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
160
32
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
40
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
101.8 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
254.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
65.13 TFLOPS
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.141 TFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
254.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
TU104
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
TU104-895-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.5
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
