NVIDIA Quadro M3000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M3000M
+347%
2.15 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
33.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
67.20 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.150 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
67.20 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
62W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF106
N16E-Q1-A1
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
