Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M4000M and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M4000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
4864 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M4000M
2.496 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T +343%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
6144
80
TMUs
192
64
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
78.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.496 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
78.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
N16E-Q3-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
8 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²

Board Design

100W
TDP
350W
-
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy