Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +2557%
4.252 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Feb 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
2048
Shading Units
64
128
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
G92
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy