Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla S1075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000 and 4GB VRAM Tesla S1075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M5000 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (211.6GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1808 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 800W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000 +583%
4.252 TFLOPS
Tesla S1075
0.622 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2015
Release Date
Jun 2008
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

861 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
211.6GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
30
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
240
128
TMUs
80
64
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

66.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.52 GPixel/s
132.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
4.252 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
622.1 GFLOPS
132.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
77.76 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GT200B
GM204-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
800W
450 W
Suggested PSU
1200 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy