NVIDIA Quadro M5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM Quadro M5000M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M5000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro M5000M
+609%
2.995 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
96
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
62.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
93.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.995 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
93.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF106
N16E-Q5-A1
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
